?
។
296
addressed to them a
I letter disclosing further Enclosure &
my
wish to act liberally towards them;
but
intimating that the Attorney General
had been instructed to try the question
of liability
in the least vexations
man mer
profaible for the purpose of obtaining decision from the Supreme Court.
8. As
mo
a
further advances were made by the Marine Lot holders, I asked M? "Keswick, resident managing partner of Jardine Matheson H6", and whose
!
name
was at the head of the list of those
who signed the reply handed in on the 3rd November, if he would
Jadmit, with
to
aque
a view to Saving expense,
all obvious facts, and try the question of
Fright by
demurrer to be
to be argued before
the Supreme Court.
9. He
once
agreed to this and I at communicated the fact to the Attorney General, who, however, found afterwards
that Mr Keswick's case was
adopted
by all the Marine Lot Holders, and that Mo Meswick had joined them
in so
conducting
issue before a jury.
it
as to send the
going
-on
10. The Acting Attorney General, Mor Ball, had been very confident of the strength of his case till shortly before the trial, when it appeared that he had been the supposition of the Phaya forming part of the premises originally demised, a thing imposible, because the Traya and Sea. Wall
and Sea Wall
are some hundred
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.